On Coherence, A Manifesto

The broken state of our world has become so obvious

that further efforts to list and attempt to convince

those who refuse to recognize it are beyond counterproductive.

We are easily distracted by nightmare scenarios, psycho-dramas,

playing-out alternative doomsdays,

whose only purpose is as a mechanism to keep us stuck,

helpless, and increasingly incapable of responding.

There are two facts, beyond the destruction of the “Natural” World

– the home for all our social, cultural, and private worlds –

that demand our attention and have received little or no consideration

in any broader arena.

First, we are damaged, psychologically damaged by everything that has taken us so far from what it is to be alive. Our Eco-dramas, all our dramas and battles, take place within the context and under the influences of this fact. We thrash about, proclaiming grievances, looking to place blame, feeling guilty, angry, helpless, hopeless; all because we fail to address this damage.

And secondly, we are addicted to certainty while what is most required of us is to develop a fluency in coherence. This boils-down the Trouble-with-Thought to its most salient aspect. When, as psychologically damaged people, addicted to certainty, we try to come to grips with the Enormity we face; we challenge our customary certainties and they begin to fail us. Since we have no means of coping with uncertainty we pull-back. We get stuck and stay that way.

What this moment requires of us is that we work to heal our selves and each other and that we learn to let our addiction to certainty fall away – Our desire for certainty is irrevocably linked to our damaged condition. What is required is that we develop a fluency in coherence.

We need to develop a fluency in coherence*.

Coherence is both an attribute of the Cosmos as it presents itself to us and, fundamentally, a way of sense-making that does not rely on conditioned belief and a whip-sawing binary opposition between certainty and doubt that characterizes all of our current modes of thought. We could say that perception and proprioception arise as packets of information. We grab for those packets that agree with our preconceptions and deny – or even fail to see – those that challenge them. Or, in a flip-flop amounting to the same thing, we rush to do the opposite, wallowing in whatever feeds our doubt, our loathing, our fears, again ignoring what does not fit.

The new David Bohm documentary,

Infinite Potential,

among its many gems prods us, in a very Bohmian fashion

to see that information is much more than the “data” of reductionism.

The term, broken into the words that make it up,

points us at the fact that information is

that which is in the process of formation,

a dynamic, a conversation, a relationship between

what-is and what-is-unfolding.

The attitude, the approach of coherence, can help at every step. Both as we work on healing and repairing damage and as we build and establish habits of thought that have nothing to do with the failed, binary approach that keeps us serially chasing after certainty and falling into Nihilism.

We imagine we know what “thinking” is,

that we know how to do it,

furrowing the brow, pondering after precedents, looking for “ideas.”

I would like to suggest that we have no sense of what it means to think.

Approaching the question of Coherence is a way to practice

a kind of thinking both unthinkable within our current conditioning

and essential if we are to have any chance going forward.

Building and establishing a fluency, a capacity to entertain coherence, takes place internally within the individual and also both between and among those entering into inquiry. This is both a way-into understanding and a way-of-life shared within circles of relation, giving practitioners and their practices a place, creating a focal-point of stated intention, which amounts to an act of purpose. Those of us who enter into joint inquiry relate together in ways that promote healing for our selves and for each other. We establish a place to live and a space where we may look further into the questions-of-coherence together, finding ways to meet the challenges our inquiry reveals yo us along the way.

We may call this intention a movement towards starting a school,

a community.

We might wait, and not call it anything at all,

and see what arises as we proceed….

As we struggle with isolation and infection

we may actually be in a better position to recognize

that such a “place” may not need to be a physical space.

At least to begin, all that is required is a commitment

to a form of shared attention.

There is one other aspect to be taken as a foundational given. We need to recognize the distinction between Faith and Belief. While every belief quickly turns into a trap; a faith-in-Faith provides us with the humility and Grace to meet whatever comes our way. There is no health without Faith. There is no inquiry without Faith.

A manifesto is a call.

We proclaim,

“This is a manifesto!”

Or, we might say,

“A new form is manifesting!

Becoming visible, becoming clear, hoving into view.”

In this sense,

this is a manifesto.

These conditions appear to have an impact on our situation. These insights appear to illuminate our situation and offer a way forward. Not – as with Manifestos as we think of them as documents of Revolution intended to bring us to an end-point, to proclaim a new certainty to replace a broken one. This is not a call to revolve, to overturn, to replace one broken set of certainties with another. This manifesto proclaims that what is coming into view is a new way of looking at our situation, at belief, at certainty, doubt, and confusion. By entering and maintaining a mode of inquiry into coherence we can heal, and we can stop compounding misery and creating suffering. We can stop feeding the forces of destruction and incoherence and we can face what comes with vitality and in Faith.

*Coherence is an approach to the unknowable.

The Cosmos is, in its depths, a Mystery.

Whether that mystery amounts to an ultimate coherence,

beyond understanding or not,

is beyond our capacities to perceive and to understand.

Our incapacity to accept the depths of mystery without

whip-sawing between delusions of certainty and Nihilism

keeps us trapped.

This may be the ultimate trap….

An attitude of, and an approach to, coherence provides us with a path to navigate between these dangers. Inquiry and the illumination its insights provide do not build chimeras of certainty and belief. They show us a path and provide a light with which to see it.

Nothing more. Nothing less….

Like what you find here?

Like what you find here?

Consider making a one-time donation

Choose an amount


Or enter a custom amount


Your contribution is appreciated.


©Antonio Dias, 2010 – 2023

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this blog’s author is strictly prohibited.

Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Antonio Dias and Antonio Dias Design with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.


Published by Antonio Dias

My work is centered on attending to the intersection of perception and creativity. Complexity cannot be reduced to any given certainty. Learning is Central: Sharing our gifts, Working together, Teaching and learning in reciprocity. Entering into shared Inquiry, Maintaining these practices as a way of life. Let’s work together to build practices, strengthen dialogue, and discover and develop community. Let me know how we might work together.

5 thoughts on “On Coherence, A Manifesto

  1. Your an excellent writer. I just came across David Bohm today, and heard about the new documentary. The only other scientist I really knew of who tried to link spirituality and science was Carl Sagan.

    Super excited to watch the documentary and learn more about his work!

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual. So are our emotions in the presence of great art or music or literature, or of acts of exemplary selfless courage such as those of Mohandas Gandhi or Martin Luther King Jr. The notion that science and spirituality are somehow mutually exclusive does a disservice to both. ~ Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark


      Still, as much as I personally love and miss Carl Sagan, it must be admitted that he was a staunch scientist in the scientistic sense of the word. I think we can forgive him that, though. Who among us hasn’t been subject to the conditioning of scientism? Question is: are we consciously aware of and seeking to supersede that conditioning? I very much doubt Dr. Sagan was, but his public life and efforts to bridge science and spirituality — not to mention, rekindle the public imagination — is to be lauded, regardless, as far as I’m concerned.

      Liked by 2 people

      1. I agree that Sagan was Scientistic. Not in the cold, calculated way the current crop is, but if only David Bohm had been accorded the platform so readily given to Sagan….
        In hindsight it is clear how hegemonic the American Century was. Even the voices we were allowed to hear in protest against the most egregious excesses were vetted and given an easier path because their messages were easily co-opted.
        Those who couldn’t be used in this way were sidelined, exiled – like Bohm – or just assassinated outright.
        For me, Sagan’s own “sins” were the result of naivety and having doors open easily for him from a young age. He was swept up in that “California Feelin’!” The worst has been the way hes been used to keep alive the whole Star Trek Fantasy!™ that our future was to be cavorting about the galaxy. Without Sagan as a prominent public figure forty years ago we’d most likely not have Elon Musk today.
        Is it unfair to blame someone from that last blush of virginal naiveté? Yes, of course it is. It’s only been since his death that so much of what was deeply wrong with every response made during the Twentieth Century to the predicament we find ourselves in has even begun to come to light.
        Returning to Bohm and Krishnamurti, their responses, made during those same years – as with James Baldwin – hold up. They were mostly ignored in their day, but speak to us now in ways that don’t require apologies.

        Liked by 2 people

      2. I love this, thank you:) Yes, I feel the importance of rekindling of science and spirituality is important especially in these days when we are dealing with numerous global crises.

        In regards to scientism, that is the main reason I was turned off from those staunch atheist types like Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins et. al. Yes, a rational framework for making sense of the world is important, but it seems like they fail at least to seriously entertain any other disciplines – in my opinion.

        Liked by 2 people

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: